Teardown standards
One evidence gap. One responsible fix.
A useful teardown should teach without shaming. It must connect a real buyer question, public evidence, one proposed fix, and an honest recheck.
Publication standard
Private submissions and partial model runs never become automatic public content.
A public teardown must use approved public evidence, preserve dates and models, explain limits, and pass human review.
Reusable format
Every teardown should answer ten questions.
Buyer question
Check date
Models tested
Brands observed
Evidence gap
One proposed fix
Follow-up recheck
Caveats
Consent or public-data basis
Moderation and consent
We do not publish private submissions automatically. Every public teardown must verify consent or a clear public-data basis, keep drafts private before approval, and require a human reviewer.